Prime Minister KP Sharma from Oli is visiting India on Chait 23. Talking about news about Prime Minister's visit to India, commentators have started. Why should India go with the prime minister? The question is common. It is not uncommon to see such questions from the general public, as the past practice and effectiveness of it. But the person who operates a government issue seems to be aware of the situation and understanding of the situation. It is similar to the experience of other countries. Being appointed as a new President in the US, despite the oath of swearing, Japanese Prime Minister is a tradition to visit.
In relation to India, the impact of complex geopolitical practice cannot be ignored. Similarly, mindset that neighbors need to get good harm in conducting regular governance. So there are both positive and negative aspects of India's visit to India. Positive in this sense such practice is in other lands too. By diplomatically, taking neighbor in faith is not wrong in itself. However, geography has become complex. Are we some limit to understanding?
As possible, the Prime Minister would be good to join the environment in Beijing. The US President is still going to China from Japan. Si Jinping was a small country from Ahmedabad, from India the Maldives. Modi had gone to Delhi with the help of Modi. Arrives from Islamabad to Islamabad in Delhi. If our prime ministers go to Delhi and go to China, then Indians will not be able to see us with suspicious eyes. Because we have already been there. Traveling with China also strengthened the relationship. The Chinese have always been a suspicious place for us. We understand it, but after going to Kathmandu, we call the bid. If we go to Beijing from Delhi, it also removes the misconduct. When traveling together, the message will also be said that both of our neighboring countries are equally important. The message goes on for the first time, that India also has something more important.
America and China's President always do this. They are the countries that have rich diplomatic practice than us. Why should not we get them? Well, from where you learn.
Strategic Tours
Some questions have been raised while going to Oliji. Especially take his nationalist image. However, this tourism seems to be somewhat strategic. It is not a claim claimed by any inner secret. The estimate of Prime Minister's program is merely an estimate. If you see the Prime Minister's three-day tour schedule, it is full of work to a large extent. Tirthur fast is not enough. Here, this tour is the basis for strategic and diplomatic.
With confidence in India, it may be a thought to expand relations with China too. It should have been preparing to visit China or visit China's President Nepal. In addition to China's crossing, it could have been assumed that it would be appropriate to increase relations with China with the confidence of India.
We need to cooperate with our neighbor to fulfill the dream of prosperity and prosperity. Learn more from China. The progress made in short time is amazing for the world. The novelists of the Western world have also been compelled to make a wonderful progress.
It is said that a visit to the Prime Minister is called a harmony tour. The Prime Minister does not have a 'shopping list' too. Now, after going to India, there may be a reason for China not to face any major problems. That is why it can be said that diplomatic and strategically intact is a tour.
As far as the doubt is concerned, India does not have to doubt about going to visit. The main thing to go to the tour is done. The last instance of the past is not going to go on a tricky journey, but the sign of the joint release is near. Instead of recognizing that India is going to China by going abroad and being nationalist, it can be matched by communicating with India by keeping its stand on it.
Proposals may come
During the tourism tour, there are old experiences of some disputes between Nepal and India. It is necessary to be alert about whether this can happen. We have been told that there is no shopping list if we have good luck. Even if we do not have a shopping list, it can be with India. India is likely to take advantage of this goodwill tour and offer some offer. Do not make it even negative. But, seeing today's experience, India seems to be only holding hold. For example, if we offer a proposal to help build the East-West Rail, but would it be like that highway highway?
Those who visit the Prime Minister and those who visit India with a proposal should not be signed. We should go into our country and discuss and reply. Otherwise, would it be like holding a license to hydropower?
There is no possibility of such offer from India. We have shattered many schemes for the last time linking to China. India has become a publication of dissatisfaction with China, contacts, trade, transit etc. It seems to be anxiety that China-linked security along the north-south railway will be a challenge. This concern is reflected by India's disappointment on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. India is not even a member of Belt and Road Innocenti, who has already passed China.
Therefore, it can not be said that it does not offer a similar project. It can also be estimated from past experiences. Vishakhapatnam may be offered access to the new port
In relation to India, the impact of complex geopolitical practice cannot be ignored. Similarly, mindset that neighbors need to get good harm in conducting regular governance. So there are both positive and negative aspects of India's visit to India. Positive in this sense such practice is in other lands too. By diplomatically, taking neighbor in faith is not wrong in itself. However, geography has become complex. Are we some limit to understanding?
As possible, the Prime Minister would be good to join the environment in Beijing. The US President is still going to China from Japan. Si Jinping was a small country from Ahmedabad, from India the Maldives. Modi had gone to Delhi with the help of Modi. Arrives from Islamabad to Islamabad in Delhi. If our prime ministers go to Delhi and go to China, then Indians will not be able to see us with suspicious eyes. Because we have already been there. Traveling with China also strengthened the relationship. The Chinese have always been a suspicious place for us. We understand it, but after going to Kathmandu, we call the bid. If we go to Beijing from Delhi, it also removes the misconduct. When traveling together, the message will also be said that both of our neighboring countries are equally important. The message goes on for the first time, that India also has something more important.
America and China's President always do this. They are the countries that have rich diplomatic practice than us. Why should not we get them? Well, from where you learn.
Strategic Tours
Some questions have been raised while going to Oliji. Especially take his nationalist image. However, this tourism seems to be somewhat strategic. It is not a claim claimed by any inner secret. The estimate of Prime Minister's program is merely an estimate. If you see the Prime Minister's three-day tour schedule, it is full of work to a large extent. Tirthur fast is not enough. Here, this tour is the basis for strategic and diplomatic.
With confidence in India, it may be a thought to expand relations with China too. It should have been preparing to visit China or visit China's President Nepal. In addition to China's crossing, it could have been assumed that it would be appropriate to increase relations with China with the confidence of India.
We need to cooperate with our neighbor to fulfill the dream of prosperity and prosperity. Learn more from China. The progress made in short time is amazing for the world. The novelists of the Western world have also been compelled to make a wonderful progress.
It is said that a visit to the Prime Minister is called a harmony tour. The Prime Minister does not have a 'shopping list' too. Now, after going to India, there may be a reason for China not to face any major problems. That is why it can be said that diplomatic and strategically intact is a tour.
As far as the doubt is concerned, India does not have to doubt about going to visit. The main thing to go to the tour is done. The last instance of the past is not going to go on a tricky journey, but the sign of the joint release is near. Instead of recognizing that India is going to China by going abroad and being nationalist, it can be matched by communicating with India by keeping its stand on it.
Proposals may come
During the tourism tour, there are old experiences of some disputes between Nepal and India. It is necessary to be alert about whether this can happen. We have been told that there is no shopping list if we have good luck. Even if we do not have a shopping list, it can be with India. India is likely to take advantage of this goodwill tour and offer some offer. Do not make it even negative. But, seeing today's experience, India seems to be only holding hold. For example, if we offer a proposal to help build the East-West Rail, but would it be like that highway highway?
Those who visit the Prime Minister and those who visit India with a proposal should not be signed. We should go into our country and discuss and reply. Otherwise, would it be like holding a license to hydropower?
There is no possibility of such offer from India. We have shattered many schemes for the last time linking to China. India has become a publication of dissatisfaction with China, contacts, trade, transit etc. It seems to be anxiety that China-linked security along the north-south railway will be a challenge. This concern is reflected by India's disappointment on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. India is not even a member of Belt and Road Innocenti, who has already passed China.
Therefore, it can not be said that it does not offer a similar project. It can also be estimated from past experiences. Vishakhapatnam may be offered access to the new port
No comments